
Green Book
Front
Contents
Applicability
Overview
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
Appendices
Doctoral
Programs
PhD: General
PhD: Theology
PhD: SPR
PhD: Phil of Rel
PhD: Ethics
ThD: General
ThD: Theology
ThD: Ethics
SPR Green
Book
Theol Red Book
QE Archive
Wildman's
Weird Wild Web
Home
Links
Jokes
Courses

|
Prospectus for the Doctoral
Program
in Science, Philosophy, and Religion
at Boston University
(a.k.a. constantly updated, hyperlinked "Green Book")
Exam 1
| Exam 2 | Exam 3 | Exam
4 | Role of Core Faculty

Overview
of SPR Qualifying Examinations
There will be three written qualifying examinations
followed by an oral qualifying examination focusing on the previous
examination material.


More precisely, the title is History and Philosophy
of Science and Religion but nobody will remember that. This is a written,
closed book, proctored examination. Six hours will be allowed;
one-and-a-half extra hours for students whose first language is not
English. Each exam involves a choice of questions but everyone in a
sitting gets the same exam. The reading list for this exam is complex,
with some sections being short and required and other sections long and
indicative of the material to be mastered by the student.


This involves themes in philosophy of religion and
also philosophical theology, in the sense of making persuasive,
constructive arguments about religious topics. This exam is similar in
most respects to the first exam except that four hours are allowed and the
reading list is more straightforward. Again, there is one extra hour for
students whose first language is not English.


This exam is focused on one particular area of the
interaction among science, philosophy, and religion; ordinarily this area
would be that of the proposed dissertation. Each student chooses between a
closed-book, four-hour examination or a long research paper, in part
depending on the nature of the topic. In either case, the student must
draw up a bibliography customized to the topic in consultation with his or
her core faculty advisor and tentative dissertation advisors. This examination can be taken only after the first two exams
are passed.


This oral examination is conducted in the presence of
at least two core SPR faculty members; other relevant faculty members are
optional. This exam is taken only after the first three exams are passed.


The procedures described assume that the SPR core
faculty has both an oversight and an inspirational role. Oversight is
important in the SPR program to regularize standards for diverse students
and projects, as well as a large and diverse group of associated faculty
drawn to work with our students. Both oversight and inspiration are
important for fostering and guiding the idiosyncratic projects that
emerge. The core faculty meet periodically to handle the
obligations that oversight brings (oral exams, evaluation of proposals for
the third exam, reading examinations, policy setting, etc.). Inspiration
is the fun part.
The SPR core faculty presently numbers Alisa Bokulich (CAS-Philosophy), Robert Neville (CAS-Philosophy,
CAS-Religion, STH), Jon Roberts (CAS-History), Wesley Wildman (STH), and
Kirk Wegter-McNelly (STH).
There are, of course, many other faculty involved in
student programs, and in many different ways.


Overview | Exam 1
| Exam 2 | Exam 3 | Exam
4 | Role of Core Faculty
The information on this page is copyright ©1994-2007, Wesley
Wildman (basic information here), unless otherwise
noted.
If you want to use ideas that you find here, please be careful to acknowledge this site as
your source, and remember also to credit the original author of what you use,
where that is applicable. If you want to use text or stories from these pages, please contact me at
the feedback address for permission.
|