Tillich's Theological Influence on Mary Daly (1928-2010)
|
Mary Daly (from
here) |
As one of the last great systematic
theologians of the modern era, Paul Tillich’s work sat
precariously at the dawning of the postmodern age. As
theology moved into a new generation of thought,
Tillich’s influence proved to be pervasive, including in
the thought process of the radical feminist theologian
Mary Daly. Much of Daly’s theology throughout her life
sprouted from and interacted with Tillich’s ideas. This
is most evident in Daly’s response to Tillich’s
conception of the role of symbols within existence,
primarily expressed in her discussions on methodology,
existence, and God.
Tillich’s influence on Daly was not
purely intellectual. She writes in her autobiography,
Outercourse, of her experience auditing Tillich’s
lectures at Harvard during her teaching stint at
Cardinal Cushing College, in which she had an eerie
premonition of the “battle with that corrosive force
that would take place many years later.” In the
interaction, she speaks of a certain “attraction to
[his] intellect and repulsion for his miasmic charisma”
(Daly, 1992: 54). Daly held strong opinions on Tillich’s
sexual life, especially in response to Tillich’s wife,
Hannah’s, biographical publication of From Time to
Time. In applying this to his theology, Daly writes
that Tillich exhibits a sort of “religious doublethink”
leading to “mythical/theological self-deception” which
reverses into “self-acceptance” (Daly 1978, 378). Daly
sympathized with Hannah particularly in the wake of
publications after Paul’s death. Applauding Hannah for
her courage to stand out of the shadow of her husband in
writing about her own perspective, Daly used the
Tillichs’ relationship and Rollo May’s “smear campaign”
of Hannah’s publications as an example of patriarchal
power oppressing women. Daly may not have received
Tillich’s personality with open arms, but there is no
doubt that his intellectual work served as an important
influence in her battle to come.
Concerning methodology, Daly does
not completely adhere to a Tillichian conception, but
still draws from Tillich’s method of correlation in her
approach to philosophy and theology. While Daly calls
the strict adherence to systematic theology
“metholatry”—idolatry of method—she and Tillich share a
similar stance on the origination of the questions of
existence. While Tillich takes a correlational approach
in answering these questions with “eternal truths,” Daly
claims a “movement of liberation”–resisting the term
“method” because of what she calls its patriarchal
semantics–through the power of women to name the world
around them (Daly, 1973: 8). Despite the differing
answers these questions provoke, the source of those
questions is the same: existence.
Daly’s interpretation of the use
and purpose of symbols within existence is a direct
reference to Tillich’s understanding of symbols. Daly
acknowledges in Pure Lust, one of her later
works, that symbols, in contrast to signs, “participate
in that to which they point,” but are never an ultimate
or perfect expression of that to which they are pointing
(Daly 1984, 25).Following this line of thought, Daly uses
several symbols from Tillich that reflect his influence
on her and her respect for his work. The most explicit
example of this is Daly’s reimagining of the term “God.”
Recognizing the patriarchy upheld in the “three-letter
word,” Daly does away with any reference to the symbol.
Instead, Daly turns to a very Tillichian sense of the
“courage to be” (Daly, 1973: 24). In this discussion,
she uses Tillich’s concepts of the state of existence as
a means to relate to the condition of women’s oppression
in the world. She construes former conceptions of God as
male and transcendent as having served as forms of
nonbeing in the world. A woman’s confrontation with
nonbeing, manifest in oppression and subjugation,
creates anxiety, which limits her full participation in
being (23). Obviously deeply moved by The Courage to
Be, Daly states that the revelatory confrontation
with nonbeing is sparked and fueled by existential
courage. And that “courage to be is the key to the
revelatory power of the feminist revolution” (24).
In Daly’s use of the expression of
the “courage to be,” her underlying connection to
Tillich emerges most explicitly. In her work and
experience in women’s liberation, Daly explores, in more
concrete application, the tensive quality of human
existence. She attends to this with other Tillichian
concepts in her explanation of the hope that emerges
after the revelatory confrontation with nonbeing. This
hope is individual and communal at the same time; “it is
hope coming from the experience of individuation and
participation” (32). In reference to one of Tillich’s
polarities, Daly acknowledges this tension required in
establishing revolutionary hope.
While she uses pieces of the
language and inquiry from Tillich’s thought, Tillich’s
analysis and use of symbology to describe God and the
human condition ultimately fall short for Daly. She
claims that, while his theology pushes the boundaries of
classic Christian theology, it is not radical enough.
She critiques Tillich for remaining detached in his
theology and shows frustration towards him for never
having shown awareness that the subjugation of women was
relevant to the discussion of the power of being (21).
Mary Ann Stenger illuminates Daly’s critique further in
stating that Daly shifts Tillich’s focus in his theology
of culture – in his famous adage, “religion is the
substance of culture and culture is the form of
religion” – from that of art, architecture, and
politics, to the women’s liberation movement (Stenger
1998). Daly writes of Tillich in Beyond God the
Father as coming close to creating theology free of
oppressive tendencies, but fails explicitly to connect
the “power of being” to sexual oppression (Daly, 1973:
21).
It is apparent that Daly by no
means wholeheartedly accepts Tillich’s theology. She
states many critiques of his personal life and
intellectual approach throughout her work. However,
there is also no doubt that she was deeply impacted by
his theological ideas. Most apparent in her
understanding and use of symbols, but also in her
analysis of methodology and human existence, Daly views
the world with a Tillichian light.
Works Cited
Daly, Mary. Beyond God
the Father (Boston: Beacon Press, 1973).
Daly, Mary. Gyn/Ecology
(Boston: Beacon Press, 1978).
Daly, Mary. Outercourse (San
Francisco: HarperCollins, 1992).
Daly, Mary. Pure Lust
(Boston: Beacon Press, 1984).
Stenger, Mary Ann. “A Critical
Analysis of the Influence of Paul Tillich on Mary Daly’s
Feminist Theology,” Encounter 43 (1982): 219-238.
The information on this page is copyright ©1994 onwards, Wesley
Wildman (basic information here), unless otherwise
noted. If you want to use text or ideas that you find here, please be careful to acknowledge this site as
your source, and remember also to credit the original author of what you use,
where that is applicable. If you have corrections or want to make comments,
please contact me at the feedback address for permission.
|