| 
	Tillich and Popular CultureTillich and German Immigrants in New YorkThe persecution by the Nazi state of 
						Germany in the 1930s, led to the emigration of several 
						thousand Germans majority of whom were Jews. Amongst the 
						emigrants was Paul Tillich who as an “émigré of émigrés”[1] 
						became concerned with the plight of the emigrants. 
						Later, in 1936, Tillich would become the founder and 
						president of the Self-help of the Émigrés from Central 
						Europe Inc., an organization that provided relief 
					  assistance to the German refugees.[2] Tillich asked the question: “Can the 
						Jews return to Germany?” he answers the question by 
						proposing four possibilities. Either way, the Jews would 
						return ‘without a problem’ or ‘with the problem’. The 
						first possibility is that of a negotiated peace with 
						non-Nazi groups without exemption; exclusive for the 
						Jews. Second, a Russian peace with a Communist 
						revolution; inclusive for the Jews without a problem 
						from the side of Germany. Third, a motion-qua-peace 
						under the leadership of the reactionary groups in 
						England and America, Germany and indirectly all of 
						Europe to suppress the revolutionary movements in 
						Germany. In this case only those Jews who are guaranteed 
						status quo with the exclusion of those with leftists’ 
						sympathy should return. Such would be part of the 
						occupying power thus considered enemies by the 
						nationalists and leftists. No Jew should return under 
						such conditions. Lastly, the establishment of a 
						socialist and communist Germany within a more or less 
						federated world. In this case the return of all the Jews 
						is possible, but probably attractive only for those who 
						agree with the end of the status quo.[3]. To the extent that the émigrés cannot 
						return to Germany, how then were they to settle in New 
						York where majority of them took temporal residence? 
						Answering this question, Tillich in an article entitled 
						“Christianity and Emigration” noted that emigration 
						itself was a religious category. He argued that the 
						history of revelation of which Jesus is at the centre 
						begins with an emigration in the call/separation of 
						Abraham: “Get thee out of thy country and from thy 
						kindred and from thy father’s home unto the land that I 
						will show thee.”[4]. He argues that, “God separates men 
						when he elects them. He separates Israel from the 
						nations and makes her an exile in Egypt, in Babylon, in 
						the Hellenic, in the Roman Empire and now in the 
						occidental world and in all nations. He separates the 
						prophets in Israel from Israel and makes them émigrés, 
						persecuted, killed in their own country. He separates 
						the followers of Christ from father and mothers and 
						brothers and makes them homeless with Christ. He 
						separates the Christian church from Judaism and paganism 
						and makes the Christians members of a community across 
						all nations and races. He separates the fighters of the 
						rights of men and social justice, from the settled life 
						of society and makes them persecuted and exiled. He 
						separates every individual Christian whom he calls from 
						the ultimate obedience to family and tribe, to nation 
						and state and makes him a citizen of another world. 
						Every new emigration, whatever the external reason may 
						be, is a new manifestation of his exclusiveness and 
						absolute claim.[5] 
						Against this background, Tillich called on the United 
						States public particularly the Christians and the Jews 
						to morally and financially support the émigrés. He also 
						called on the Christians to avoid any active missionary 
						drive from the Christian side directed towards believing 
						Jews. Rather the Christian mission to the Jews should be 
						receptive in nature i.e. a readiness on the on the part 
						of the Christians to receive Jews in such cases where 
						the Jewish person has recognized his existential 
						boundaries and then raised the question about what lies 
						beyond. Lastly, the Jewish attitude of voluntary 
						segregation should be tolerated without any religious or 
						political anti-Semitism.   
							Notes
								
								
								
								[1] The 
								Presbyterian Tribune, New York City, October, 
								29, 1936, p.2 
								
								
								
								[3] Tillich, 
								Paul, “Can the Jews Return to Germany?” Archival 
								Sources; Harvard-Andover Library. 
								
								
								
								[4] The 
								Presbyterian Tribune, New York City, October, 
								29, 1936, p.2 
								
								
								
								[5] The 
								Presbyterian Tribune, New York City, October, 
								29, 1936 
						 The information on this page is copyright ©1994 onwards, Wesley
Wildman (basic information here), unless otherwise 
noted. If you want to use text or ideas that you find here, please be careful to acknowledge this site as
your source, and remember also to credit the original author of what you use, 
where that is applicable. If you have corrections or want to make comments, 
please contact me at the feedback address for permission. |