Propagation curves. Upper trace is peak-positive pressure.
Lower trace is the peak-negative pressure. The geometrical focus is at
47 mm. The large peak in p+ around 37 mm appears to be due to the
spike from the back of the waveform. Here are the propagation curves from a higher resolution for comparison. |
Axial Waveforms. The
axial waveforms show far more nonlinear distortion and lengthening than
the water waveforms, as one would expect. The large spike in the tail of
the waveform at z=40 mm corresponds with the observed peak in the
propagation curve for p+. Here are the axial waveforms from a higher resolution. |
Propagation curves. The curves show similar qualitative
behaviour to the results using the model source waveform - infact the
peakin p+ occurs even closer tothe source. This
indicates that there is not something peculiar happening with the
truncation of the model source waveform. ![]() The oscillations in p+ are Gibbs type phenomenon and can be suppressed by adding more points and waiting longer for the code to run. |
Axial Waveforms. The spike in the waveform in this case
occurs even earlier and is even more pronounced than in the case of the
more realistic model waveform. This corroborates the fact that the it
is not a peculiarity in the source waveform that is repsonsible for the
spike. The presence of the spike is due to the stronger nonlinearity and
diffraction present in the FC-43 scenario. |
RETURN to Robin's home page.
| robinc@bu.edu | http://people.bu.edu/robinc/kzk/ | September 1999 |